Payroll tax levy Employment tax levies Payroll Tax Problem

IRS provides guidance on new rules for employment tax levies

Mike Habib, EA

The IRS has issued interim guidance to its directors and collection area offices that explains when it is permissible to issue a levy to collect employment taxes without first giving the taxpayer a pre-levy collection due process (CDP) notice.

The IRS is authorized to take various collection actions in order to ensure the payment and collection of employment taxes, including issuing federal tax levies. Before a tax levy can be issued, however, the IRS must generally provide the taxpayer with notice and an opportunity for an administrative CDP hearing, and for judicial review.

The Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 (the Act) modified the collection due process procedures for employment tax liabilities. The Act amended IRC §6330(f), effective for levies served after Sept. 21, 2007, to permit levies to collect employment taxes without first giving the taxpayer a pre-levy CDP notice, if the levy is a “disqualified employment tax levy” (DETL). IRC §6330(h) defines a DETL as a levy to collect the employment tax liability of a taxpayer (or predecessor) who requested a CDP hearing for unpaid employment taxes in the two-year period prior to the beginning of the taxable period for which the levy is served.

The guidance includes the following examples on the new rules:
Example 1. The taxpayer owes taxes on Form 941 for the 4th quarter 2005 (quarter ended Dec. 31, 2005). The taxpayer requested a timely CDP levy hearing. The taxpayer accrues additional employment tax liability on Form 941 for the second quarter 2006 (quarter ended June 30, 2006). The liability period for additional tax began on April 1, 2006. The additional liability for the second quarter 2006 qualifies for a DETL levy because the taxpayer requested a prior levy hearing for a quarter that ended (Dec. 31, 2005) within the two-year lookback period (April 1, 2004 through April 1, 2006).

Example 2. The taxpayer owes taxes on Form 941 for the 1st quarter 2006 (quarter ended March 31, 2006). The taxpayer requested a timely CDP levy hearing. The taxpayer was assessed additional employment tax liability on Form 941 for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2005. The liability period for additional tax began on Oct. 1, 2005. The additional liability for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2005 does not qualify for a DETL levy because the taxpayer requested a prior levy hearing for a quarter that ended (March 31, 2006) outside the two-year lookback period (Oct. 1, 2003 through Oct. 1, 2005).

If a DETL is served, the taxpayer must be given an opportunity for a CDP hearing within a reasonable period of time after the levy and may seek judicial review of the IRS ruling in tax court.

The new IRS guidance is effective March 3, 2008.

If you have a payroll tax problem and need professional representation CLICK HERE

Mike Habib, EA
myIRSTaxRelief.com

As an IRS licensed Enrolled Agent (EA) specializing in IRS Tax Problem Resolution, I can represent individuals and businesses in all of the following states, counties, and metro cities, Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington D.C.. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming. AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY New York, Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, Ventura, Lancaster, Palmdale, Santa Barbara, Chicago, Washington D. C., Silicon Valley, Philadelphia, Boston, Detroit, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Miami, Seattle, Phoenix, Minneapolis, Cleveland, San Diego, St Louis, Denver, San Juan, Tampa, Pittsburgh, Portland, Cincinnati, Sacramento, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Orlando, Indianapolis, San Antonio, Norfolk & VB, Las Vegas, Columbus, Charlotte, New Orleans, Salt Lake City, Greensboro, Austin, Nashville, Providence, Raleigh, Hartford, Buffalo, Memphis, West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, Rochester, Grand Rapids, Reno, Oklahoma City, Louisville, Richmond, Greenville, Dayton, Fresno, Birmingham, Honolulu, Albany, Tucson, Tulsa, Tempe, Syracuse, Omaha, Albuquerque, Knoxville, El Paso, Bakersfield, Allentown, Harrisburg, Scranton, Toledo, Baton Rouge, Youngstown, Springfield, Sarasota, Little Rock, Orlando, McAllen, Stockton, Charleston, Wichita, Mobile, Columbia, Colorado Springs, Fort Wayne, Daytona Beach, Lakeland, Johnson City, Lexington, Augusta, Melbourne, Lancaster, Chattanooga, Des Moines, Kalamazoo, Lansing, Modesto, Fort Myers, Jackson, Boise, Billings, Madison, Spokane, Montgomery, and Pensacola

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Mike has given us peace of mind! He helped negotiate down a large balance and get us on a payment plan that we can afford with no worries! The stress of dealing with the IRS is huge and Mike helped us through it all. The peace of mind is invaluable, thank you Mike!April S.
★★★★★
Mike Habib - Thank you for being so professional and honest and taking care of my brothers IRS situation. We are so relieved it is over and the offer in compromise process went just as you said. Mike is very professional and will give you honest answers to the OIC process and you can really trust him. You won't be sorry you chose him!Joe and Deborah V.
★★★★★
Mike is a true professional. He really came thru for me and my business. Dealing with the IRS is very scary. I'm a small business person who works hard and Mike helped me see that they are not that scary after all. He was always there with the answers I needed and was very good about calling me back which I appreciated since your first reaction is to freak out and ask a million questions. He solved a messy case and worked very hard to resolve it. His rates are VERY reasonable for the amount of work he does! I give him my highest recommendation!Marcie R.
★★★★★
Mike was incredibly responsive to my IRS issues. Once I decided to go with him (after interviewing numerous other tax professionals), he got on the phone with the IRS immediately (as in the same day I signed with him) to squash an impending issue. And he worked directly with them to quickly come to a resolution I am very happy with. I'd highly recommend reaching out to Mike to see if he can help you with any IRS issues. I'm very satisfied!Marshall W.
★★★★★
I’ve seen and heard plenty of commercials on TV and radio for businesses offering tax help. I did my research on many of them only to discover numerous complaints and unresolved tax issues. I found Mike Habib through my own online search and contacted him. He was very professional with great communication, always answering my questions and concerns. Mike resolved my complicated tax problem just as he said he would. I would definitely recommend his services to family and friends.Nancy & Sal V.

BBB Accredited Business
Trust Link
California Society of Enrolled Agents
NAEA
NATP
Enrolled Agent