|

District court allows $60 million of income to be offset by Son-of-Boss shelter

Sala v. U.S. (DC Co 4/22/08) 101 AFTR 2d ¶ 2008720

Mike Habib, EA
myIRSTaxRelief.com A district court has allowed an individual to offset $60 million of compensation income with losses from a Son-of-Boss transaction.

Facts. Carlos E. Sala had income in 2000 of more than $60 million. However, he claimed a tax loss that essentially nullified his tax burden. Sala achieved the loss through his involvement in a foreign currency options investment transaction known as Deerhurst. He claimed that the $60 million loss resulted from a series of steps that made use of an S corporation (Solid Currencies, Inc.) and an investment in a partnership (Deerhurst Investors, GP). These steps were orchestrated under a then-existing tax rule that disregarded short options as liabilities for purposes of establishing partnership basis. Under this rule, liabilities created by short options were considered too contingent to affect a partner’s basis in the partnership.

IRS challenged this transaction, which is commonly known as a Son-of-Boss shelter, on various grounds. The district court faced these key issues:

    (1) whether the transactions creating Sala’s 2000 tax loss were sham transactions;
    (2) whether Sala had a profit motive for entering into the transactions creating his 2000 tax loss;
    (3) whether the transactions creating Sala’s 2000 tax loss, as executed, allowed the tax loss; and
    (4) whether any allowable tax loss was rendered retroactively disallowed by Reg. § 1.752-6.

Continue reading ›

|

Enhanced tax breaks make it an especially good time to buy business autos

Mike Habib, EA
myIRSTaxRelief.com Thanks to economic woes in general and financial trouble for auto manufacturers in particular, it’s a good time to shop for a new vehicle, if you can afford to do so. Thanks to bonus first year depreciation deductions under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, it’s an even better time to buy if the vehicle is going to be used for business. This Practice Alert takes a close look at the enhanced first year write-offs that are available to new business autos, light trucks or vans that are placed in service this year.

Bonus depreciation basics. In general, for property placed in service after Dec. 31, 2007, in tax years ending after that date, taxpayers get an additional depreciation deduction in the placed-in-service year equal to 50% of the adjusted basis of “qualified property.” (Code Sec. 168(k)(1)) This is property that meets all of these conditions:

    • It is property falling within one of four statutory categories, the most important of which is property to which MACRS applies with a recovery period of 20 years or less. (Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(A))
    • The original use of the property commences with the taxpayer after Dec. 31, 2007. Original use is the first use to which the property is put, whether or not that use corresponds to the taxpayer’s use of the property. (Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(A))
    • The property is acquired by the taxpayer (a) after Dec. 31, 2007, and before Jan. 1, 2009, but only if no binding written contract for the acquisition is in effect before Jan. 1, 2008, or (b) pursuant to a binding written contract which was entered into after Dec. 31, 2007, and before Jan. 1, 2009. (Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(A)(iii))
    • The property is placed in service after Dec. 31, 2007, and before Jan. 1, 2009 (the placed-in-service date is extended for one year for certain property with a recovery period of ten years or longer and certain transportation property). (Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(B), Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(C))

    If all of the Code Sec. 168(k) requirements are met, bonus first-year depreciation automatically applies to qualified property, unless the taxpayer “elects out” under Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(C)(iii).

    Under pre-Stimulus Act regs that taxpayers may rely on pending further guidance, the bonus depreciation allowance is found by multiplying the qualifying property’s unadjusted depreciable basis by 50%. (Reg. § 1.168(k)-1(d)(1)(A)) The unadjusted depreciable basis is basis for gain or loss purposes, before depreciation, amortization, or depletion, less a number of adjustments, including a reduction in basis for personal use (i.e., use other than for trade or business or investment purposes), and a reduction for any portion of the property expensed under Code Sec. 179. (Reg. § 1.168(k)-1(a)(2)(iii))

    Continue reading ›

    |

    Qualified joint venture’s rental real estate income isn’t subject to self-employment tax – Chief Counsel Advice 200816030

    Mike Habib, EA
    myIRSTaxRelief.com In Chief Counsel Advice (CCA), IRS has concluded that the qualified joint venture election under Code Sec. 761(f) doesn’t cause self-employment tax to be imposed on income from a rental real estate business that would otherwise be excluded. Dividends and capital gains are similarly excluded. The qualified joint venture election, which was recently added by the Small Business and Work Opportunity Act of 2007 (Small Business Act), allows eligible married co-owners to avoid filing partnership returns and both spouses to receive credit for social security and Medicare coverage purposes.

    Background on qualified joint ventures. The Small Business Act provision generally allows a qualified joint venture whose only members are a husband and wife filing a joint return not to be treated as a partnership for Federal tax purposes. (Code Sec. 761(f)) A qualified joint venture is a joint venture involving the conduct of a trade or business, if:

      (1) the only members of the joint venture are a husband and wife,
      (2) both spouses materially participate in the trade or business, and
      (3) both spouses elect to have the provision apply. (Code Sec. 761(f)(2))

    The meaning of material participation is the same as under the passive activity loss rules in Code Sec. 469(h) and its regs.

    Continue reading ›

    |

    TIGTA audit reviews effectiveness of IRS processing of Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax Return [Audit Report No. 2008-40-089]: The

    IRS should encourage more states to participate in its Alternative Proof of Payment Program for the collection of the Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax (also known as the Heavy Vehicle Use Tax), the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) said in a recent audit.

    The tax is a federal highway use tax paid annually on vehicles with a taxable gross weight of 55,000 or more pounds, designed to carry a load over public highways, and expected to be used more than 5,000 miles (more than 7,500 miles for agricultural uses). Typically, after a taxpayer files Form 2290 (Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax Return) and pays the tax, IRS stamps the Schedule of Heavy Highway Vehicles (Schedule I) of the form to show payment was received and returns it to the taxpayer for use as proof of payment for vehicle registration.

    The Alternative Proof of Payment Program is based on an agreement between IRS and a state department of motor vehicles that allows taxpayers to simultaneously file Form 2290, pay the tax, and register their vehicles.

    Continue reading ›

    |

    Grantor’s power to substitute trust property didn’t trigger inclusion in estate – Rev Rul 2008-22, 2008-16 IRB 796

    Mike Habib, EA
    myIRSTaxRelief.com A new revenue ruling concludes that the corpus of an irrevocable trust that a grantor created during life is not includible in his gross estate under Code Sec. 2036 or Code Sec. 2038 on account of the grantor having retained the power, exercisable in a nonfiduciary capacity, to acquire property held by the trust by substituting other property of equivalent value.

      Observation: This ruling is good news for anyone who wants to set up a defective grantor trust – a trust intentionally structured so that the grantor, rather than the trust or its beneficiaries, will be taxed on the trust’s income without the trust being included in the grantor’s estate. Under Code Sec. 675(4), a grantor’s power to substitute property causes trust income to be taxed to the grantor and is commonly used to create a defective grantor trust. The new ruling gives this technique a big boost by making it clear that such a power of substitution won’t cause inclusion in the grantors’ estate.

    Background. Under Code Sec. 2036, a decedent’s gross estate includes transfers under which he retained the possession or enjoyment of, or the right to the income from, the transferred property. The decedent need not have a legally enforceable right, but there must be an agreement, either expressed or implied, that the decedent will retain the benefit. Under Code Sec. 2038 , a decedent’s gross estate includes a lifetime transfer if the enjoyment of the transferred property was subject at his death to any change through the exercise by him of a power to alter, amend, revoke or terminate. This includes any power affecting the time or manner of enjoyment of property or its income. Inclusion is not required under Code Sec. 2036 or Code Sec. 2038 if the transfer was a bona fide sale for full and adequate consideration.

    Facts. In Year 1, Danny, a U.S. citizen, established and funded an irrevocable inter vivos trust (Trust) for the benefit of his descendants. Danny is barred from serving as Trustee. Danny has the power, exercisable at any time, to acquire any property held in Trust by substituting other property of equivalent value. The power is exercisable by Danny in a nonfiduciary capacity, without the approval or consent of any person acting in a fiduciary capacity. To exercise the power of substitution, he must certify in writing that the substituted property and the trust property for which it is substituted are of equivalent value.

    Continue reading ›

    |

    Offsets in Senate Finance’s farm bill include Schedule F loss limits, optional self-employment tax, and information reporting

    Mike Habib, EA

    MyIRSTaxRelief.com

    On April 18, the Senate Finance Committee conferees on the farm bill announced $2.4 billion of reforms/offsets – “double the reforms in the House or Senate bills alone” – that could be used to fully offset the farm bill. These reforms/offsets (along with a slight decrease in the ethanol tax credit) would include:

    Continue reading ›
    badge
    badge
    badge
    badge
    badge
    badge
    Contact Information
    Main Office
    13215 Penn St #329
    Whittier, CA 90602
    Phone: 562-204-6700Toll Free: 877-788-2937Fax: 562-265-8622
    There is a time for everything... a time to weep and a time to laugh, a time to mourn and a time to dance.
    Ecclesiastes 3:1-4

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    Copyright © 2025, Mike Habib, EA
    JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design