IRS tax audit and IRS tax problems facing transportation or construction businesses, and other similar industries

IRS tax audit and IRS tax problems facing transportation or construction businesses, and other similar industries

IRS SBSE-04-0108-003, 1/14/08

The IRS has reissued interim guidance that provides audit guidelines to its examiners reviewing excess per diem payments. The original guidance expired in November 2007.

The original guidance (IRS SBSE-04-1106-049) affected taxpayers who paid reimbursement allowances to employees for travel expenses in amounts that exceeded the federal per diem rate, without treating such excess amounts as wages for employment tax purposes. The excess payments called into question whether the employer had an accountable plan. Payments under an accountable plan are treated as nontaxable expense reimbursements. In contrast, payments under a nonaccountable plan are wages that must be reported on Forms W-2 and that are subject to employment taxes.

In November 2006, the IRS issued Rev Rul 2006-56, 2006-46 IRB 874. The ruling discussed the proper employment tax treatment of expense allowance payments where an employer routinely failed to treat amounts exceeding the federal per diem rate as wages. The ruling said that the entire reimbursement for business-travel-related meals and incidental expenses must be treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan (and, thus, as wages) if an employer doesn’t track expenses and doesn’t require employees either to actually substantiate expenses or pay back amounts in excess of the deemed substantiated amount.

Periods ending before Jan. 1, 2007. The interim guidance noted that most taxpayers who were not in compliance with Rev Rul 2006-56, 2006-46 IRB 874, after its November 2006 release needed time to update or secure accounting software that enabled them to compute the proper amount of additional wages. As a result, for taxable periods ending on or before Dec. 31, 2006, the IRS advised its examiners not to treat a plan as entirely nonaccountable solely because excess per diem payments were not treated as wages, absent egregious circumstances or evidence of intentional noncompliance. Instead, the examiner should only treat the amounts in excess of the federal per diem limit as wages.

Periods ending after Dec. 31, 2006. Effective Jan. 1, 2007, the IRS instructed its examiners to determine if the plan is abusive, based on: (1) the extent the excess payments are not treated as wages, and (2) whether a system for tracking excess payments is being utilized. If an employer utilizes a system for tracking excess payments, then the fact that the employer (due to errors in its system) routinely pays excess allowances that are not treated as wages will generally not be treated as a pattern of abuse by the examiner. If a plan evidences a pattern of abuse, all of the per diem payments made under the plan will be treated as taxable wages. The IRS notes that each case stands on its own, and a determination must be made based on the “facts and circumstances” of each particular situation.

The IRS said that the excess per diem issue most frequently arises in audits of transportation or construction businesses, but can affect other industries as well.

We provide professional tax representation CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO Mike Habib, EA

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Mike has given us peace of mind! He helped negotiate down a large balance and get us on a payment plan that we can afford with no worries! The stress of dealing with the IRS is huge and Mike helped us through it all. The peace of mind is invaluable, thank you Mike!April S.
★★★★★
Mike Habib - Thank you for being so professional and honest and taking care of my brothers IRS situation. We are so relieved it is over and the offer in compromise process went just as you said. Mike is very professional and will give you honest answers to the OIC process and you can really trust him. You won't be sorry you chose him!Joe and Deborah V.
★★★★★
Mike is a true professional. He really came thru for me and my business. Dealing with the IRS is very scary. I'm a small business person who works hard and Mike helped me see that they are not that scary after all. He was always there with the answers I needed and was very good about calling me back which I appreciated since your first reaction is to freak out and ask a million questions. He solved a messy case and worked very hard to resolve it. His rates are VERY reasonable for the amount of work he does! I give him my highest recommendation!Marcie R.
★★★★★
Mike was incredibly responsive to my IRS issues. Once I decided to go with him (after interviewing numerous other tax professionals), he got on the phone with the IRS immediately (as in the same day I signed with him) to squash an impending issue. And he worked directly with them to quickly come to a resolution I am very happy with. I'd highly recommend reaching out to Mike to see if he can help you with any IRS issues. I'm very satisfied!Marshall W.
★★★★★
I’ve seen and heard plenty of commercials on TV and radio for businesses offering tax help. I did my research on many of them only to discover numerous complaints and unresolved tax issues. I found Mike Habib through my own online search and contacted him. He was very professional with great communication, always answering my questions and concerns. Mike resolved my complicated tax problem just as he said he would. I would definitely recommend his services to family and friends.Nancy & Sal V.

BBB Accredited Business
Trust Link
California Society of Enrolled Agents
NAEA
NATP
Enrolled Agent