Tightened home sale exclusion and other revenue raisers in the 2008 Housing Act

Mike Habib, EA To pay for the $15.1 billion of housing tax incentives in the recently enacted “Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008” (the Housing Act), Congress passed several offsetting revenue raisers, including a requirement that banks provide information returns reporting annual credit card sales to IRS and to merchants, a provision requiring homeowners to pay tax on gains made from the sale of a second home to reflect the portion of time the home was used as a vacation or rental property, and a provision delaying for one year a “worldwide interest allocation provision” that would result in lower taxes for some multinational companies. Here are the details of these revenue-raising provisions.

Payment card and third party network information reporting For returns for calendar years beginning after 2010, the new law requires banks and online payment networks to file an information return with IRS reporting the gross amount of credit and debit card payments a merchant receives during the year, along with the merchant’s name, address, and taxpayer identification number (TIN). Reporting is also required for third party network transactions. Information reporting for third party network transactions will be required only for merchants that have (1) annual credit and debit card transactions exceeding $20,000 in the aggregate, and (2) an aggregate number of such transactions during the year that exceeds 200.

Credit for first-time homebuyers in the 2008 Housing Act

Mike Habib, EA The single largest provision in the $15.1 billion package of housing tax incentives in the recently enacted “Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008” (the Housing Act) is a measure allowing individuals buying their first home to take a tax credit of up to $7,500 of the purchase price. Designed to help reduce the existing stock of unoccupied housing, the tax credit allows qualified homebuyers to subtract the credit amount from their federal income tax when they buy a home. However, they are then required to pay the credit back over 15 years. The result is that the credit resembles an interest-free loan that must be repaid to the government. Here are the details of the new credit:

    • Individuals may credit the lesser of $7,500 or 10% of the price paid for the home against tax owed in the year of purchase. The $7,500 maximum credit applies both to individuals and married couples filing a joint return. A married individual filing separately can claim a maximum credit of $3,750.
    • The credit phases out for individual taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income between $75,000 and $95,000 ($150,000-$170,000 for joint filers) for the year of purchase.
    • In the second year after purchase, taxpayers who took the credit must start adding the credit amount back into taxes paid incrementally over 15 years with no interest charge. This would work as follows. Suppose a first-time homebuyer purchases a home this coming December. He could claim a tax credit equal to 10 percent of the purchase price of the home or $75,000, whichever is smaller, on his 2008 tax return. Assuming for purposes of this example that the amount of his credit is $7,500, he then would be required to pay $500 (one-fifteenth of the credit) back on his 2010 tax return and on his return for each of the following 14 years.
    • If the taxpayer sells the home (or the home ceases to be used as the principal residence of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s spouse) prior to complete repayment of the credit, any remaining credit repayment amount is due on the tax return for the year in which the home is sold (or ceases to be used as the principal residence). However, the credit repayment amount may not exceed the amount of gain from the sale of the residence to an unrelated person. For this purpose, gain is determined by reducing the basis of the residence by the amount of the credit to the extent not previously recaptured. No amount is recaptured after the death of a taxpayer. In the case of an involuntary conversion of the home, recapture is not accelerated if a new principal residence is acquired within a two-year period. In the case of a transfer of the residence to a spouse or to a former spouse incident to divorce, the transferee spouse (and not the transferor spouse) will be responsible for any future recapture.
    • The tax credit is refundable, meaning that households with incomes too low to owe income taxes could benefit from it.
    • The credit applies to homes purchased on or after April 9, 2008 and on or before July 1, 2009. A special rule allows those who purchase a principal residence after Dec. 31, 2008, and before July 1, 2009, to treat the purchase as made on Dec. 31, 2008 (effectively allowing them to claim the credit on their 2008 returns rather than on their 2009 returns).
    • A taxpayer is considered a first-time homebuyer if the individual (and the individual’s spouse if married) had no ownership interest in a principal residence in the U.S. during the 3-year period prior to the purchase of the home to which the credit applies.
    • No credit is allowed if the D.C. homebuyer credit is allowable for the taxable year the residence is purchased or a prior tax year, the taxpayer’s financing is from tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, the taxpayer is a nonresident alien, the taxpayer disposes of the residence (or it ceases to be a principal residence) before the close of the tax year for which the credit otherwise would be allowable, or the home is acquired from certain related persons or by gift or inheritance.

I hope this information is helpful. For tax problem resolution CLICK HERE.

Property tax deduction for non-itemizers in the 2008 Housing Act

Included in the $15.1 billion package of housing tax incentives in the recently enacted “Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008” (the Housing Act) is a measure creating a new, temporary property tax deduction for non-itemizers (i.e., for taxpayers who claim the standard deduction rather than itemizing their deductions). Here is a brief overview of this new provision:

  • The provision creates a new standard deduction for state and local real property taxes paid by non-itemizers. Since most homeowners who are paying on a mortgage have enough deductions (e.g., mortgage interest and property taxes) to justify itemizing them on their return, this new provision chiefly benefits homeowners who have paid off their homes.
  • The deduction is available only for one year–for tax years beginning in 2008.
  • The amount of deduction is as much as $500 for single filers and $1,000 for joint filers. Since this is a deduction and not a credit (i.e., a dollar-for-dollar reduction in tax liability), the actual tax benefit will not be substantial: $100 to a couple in the 10 percent tax bracket and $150 to a couple in the 15 percent bracket (and only $50 and $75, respectively, to singles in these brackets).

I hope this information is helpful.

For tax problem resolution CLICK HERE.

IRS explains how to claim (or elect out of) 50% Kansas bonus depreciation Notice 2008-67, 2008-32 IRB

Mike Habib, EA

The Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, popularly known as the Farm Act, provided temporary GO Zone-style tax relief for taxpayers in Kiowa County, Kansas, and surrounding areas, who were affected by the storms and tornadoes that began on May 4, 2007. This relief includes 50% bonus depreciation (Kansas additional first year depreciation) for qualified Recovery Assistance (RA) property placed in service by the taxpayer on or after May 5, 2007, during the tax year that includes May 5, 2007. IRS has issued detailed guidance explaining how to claim (or elect out of) this Kansas bonus depreciation.

No FUTA exemption for staffing company that was considered the employer for state UI purposes Chief Counsel Advice 200827007

Mike Habib, EA

The IRS has denied a federal unemployment tax (FUTA) exemption to a staffing company because it did not consider the company to be the common law employer of the workers in question

Proposed revenue ruling gives green light to use of private trust companies Notice 2008-63, 2008-31 IRB

Mike Habib, EA

A new notice contains a proposed revenue ruling that would allow families to use private trust companies (PTCs) in their estate planning without adverse income, estate, gift or generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax consequences for the trust creators or beneficiaries in carefully defined situations. IRS requests comments on the proposed ruling.

National Taxpayer Advocate annual report to Congress identifies priorities and issues for upcoming year [IR 2008-87]:

An annual report on the priority challenges and issues facing the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate (OTA) was delivered to Congress on July 8.

The report, National Taxpayer Advocate’s 2009 Objectives Report to Congress, cited three areas for “particular emphasis” in fiscal year 2009, which begins on Oct. 1.

Charitable remainder trust can be divided into separate trusts without adverse tax consequences Rev Rul 2008-41, 2008-30 IRB Mike Habib, EA

In the context of two fairly detailed factual situations, a new revenue ruling makes it clear that a charitable remainder trust (CRT) can be divided into two or more separate CRTs without adverse tax consequences. If properly effected, the separate trusts will continue to qualify as CRTs, the division won’t be a sale, and no excise taxes will arise under Code Sec. 507(c), Code Sec. 4941 or Code Sec. 4945.

Background. In general, a charitable remainder trust (CRT) provides for a specified periodic distribution to one or more noncharitable beneficiaries for life or for a term of years with an irrevocable remainder interest held for the benefit of charity. A CRUT pays a unitrust amount at least annually to the beneficiaries as opposed to a charitable remainder annuity trust or CRAT, which pays a sum certain at least annually to the beneficiaries. (Code Sec. 664)

IRS discusses easing of cell phone recordkeeping requirements [Information Letter 2008-0012]:

The IRS has issued an information letter in response to a question regarding the noted difficultly that states and localities are having drafting cell phone policies that comply with IRS recordkeeping requirements.

Under IRC §162(a), individuals may take deductions for all ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on a trade or business. The expenses are considered tax-free working condition fringe benefits, not subject to FITW, FICA, and FUTA, if they are incurred by an employee on behalf of an employer. Cell phones are currently included in the definition of “listed property,” as defined in IRC §280F(d)(4).

Expenses related to listed property may not be deducted under IRC §274(d), unless the employee substantiates by adequate records, or by sufficient evidence corroborating the employee’s own statement: (1) the amount of the expenses; (2) the time and place of the expenses; (3) the business purpose of the expenses; and (4) the business relationship to the employee of the persons involved in the expenses. In addition, employees must document their personal use of the property, and the employer must include such use in the employee’s income.

badge
badge
badge
badge
badge
badge
Contact Information