District court holds that stipends paid to medical residents were exempt from FICA
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. U.S. (DC MN 4/1/2008) 101 AFTR 2d ¶ 2008-647
District court holds that stipends paid to medical residents were exempt from FICA
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. U.S. (DC MN 4/1/2008) 101 AFTR 2d ¶ 2008-647
New, changed and expired provisions affect 2008 individual estimated tax
Mike Habib, EA
MyIRSTaxRelief.com
Apr. 15, 2008 is the due date for affected calendar year taxpayers to make their first installment of 2008 estimated tax. There aren’t any drastic changes in the estimated tax rules themselves for 2008. However, there are a number of new, changed and expiring provisions that will affect some individuals’ estimated tax computations for 2008. This article provides a brief overview of the estimated tax rules for individuals and looks at the changes that may impact 2008 estimated taxes.
Who needs to pay estimated tax. Individuals who have income that is not subject to withholding (for example, earnings from self-employment, interest, dividends, rents, alimony, etc.) must pay estimated tax or face a penalty. In addition, taxpayers who do not elect voluntary withholding on unemployment compensation and the taxable part of social security payments also may have to pay estimated tax on those items or face a penalty. (Code Sec. 6654)
When and how much to pay. For 2008 estimated tax, in general, a taxpayer must pay 25% of a “required annual payment” by Apr. 15, 2008, June 16, 2008, Sept. 15, 2008 and Jan. 15, 2009 to avoid an underpayment penalty. (Code Sec. 6654(c))
Trucking Tax & Accounting: Back Taxes – Unfiled delinquent tax returns – IRS & State audits – Messy books / accounting
Homes sold by estate beneficiary remained subject to federal estate tax liens
First American Title Insurance Co., et al. v. U.S. (CA9 3/27/2008) 101 AFTR 2d ¶ 2008-622
IRS issues proposed regs reflecting PPA changes and guidance for notice of retroactively effective plan amendments
I want to extend my thanks to the members of the Senate and the Senate Finance Committee, especially Chairman Baucus and Senator Grassley. I also want to thank President Bush for nominating me and Treasury Secretary Paulson for his support.
The Internal Revenue Service touches virtually every adult, every business and every non-profit organization in America. It is an honor to assume the leadership of this critical agency. I recognize the great responsibility I have been given and will work to ensure that the IRS is fair, impartial and respects the rights of all taxpayers.
As Commissioner, I will concentrate on both enforcement and service. For the majority of Americans who pay their taxes willingly and on time, there must be clear guidance, accessible education and outstanding service. Our aim should be to make it as easy as possible for citizens to pay the correct amount of taxes in the most efficient and least burdensome manner possible.
What are your chances for being audited? IRS’s 2007 data book provides some clues
myIRSTaxRelief.com
IRS has issued its annual data book, which provides statistical data on its fiscal year (FY) 2007 activities. As this article explains, the data book provides valuable information about how many tax returns IRS examines (audits), and what categories of returns IRS is focusing its resources on, as well as data on other enforcement activities, such as collections.
What are the chances of being examined? A total of 1,384,563 individual income tax returns were audited during FY 2007 (Oct. 1, 2006 through Sept. 30, 2007) out of a total of 134.5 million individual returns that were filed in the previous year This works out to 1.0% of all individual returns filed (slightly higher than the 0.97% audit rate for the preceding year).
Investors suffered theft loss in connection with company that issued sub-prime loans
myIRSTaxRelief.com
A Chief Counsel Advice (CCA) has concluded that a theft occurred in connection with investors’ losses on loans to a company engaged in writing sub-prime loans. However, it determined that whether and when a theft occurred for any particular investor, and what losses resulted from the theft, was a question of fact since the company had been engaged in legitimate business for many years before the theft occurred.
IRS unveils 2008 list of notorious tax scams – the “Dirty Dozen”