Presidential candidates discuss merits of increasing the Social Security tax:

Mike Habib, EA

With less than three months until the 2008 presidential election, both candidates have expressed their views about a possible Social Security tax increase. The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) imposes two taxes on employers, employees, and self-employed workers — one for Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI; commonly known as the Social Security tax), and the other for Hospital Insurance (HI; commonly known as the Medicare tax).

Innocent spouse relieved of tax from embezzlement and forgery

Yakubik, TC Summary Opinion 2008-74

Mike Habib, EA The Tax Court recently held that the IRS abused its discretion in not granting equitable innocent spouse relief to a husband whose wife embezzled funds from her employer and forged checks taken from her stepfather.

REIT changes in the 2008 Housing Act

Mike Habib, EA Included in the $15.1 billion of housing tax incentives in the recently enacted “Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008” (the Housing Act) is a package of changes liberalizing the real estate investment trust (REIT) rules. Under these new provisions:

  • Foreign exchange gains that a REIT generates from operating real estate outside of the U.S. generally will qualify under both REIT gross income tests.
  • The limit on a REIT’s ownership of taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs) increases from 20% to 25% of the REIT’s gross assets.
  • The safe harbor test for dealer sales is changed by reducing the holding period requirement from four years to two years and by allowing measurement of the 10% sales test by fair market value instead of tax basis.
  • Health care facilities can be leased by a TRS to a REIT under the same rules that currently apply to lodging facilities.
  • The new rules for REITs are generally effective for tax years beginning after the date of enactment. However, some of the effective dates are accelerated to apply to transactions entered into after the date of enactment, e.g,. dispositions tested under the dealer sales rules.

I hope this information is helpful.

For tax problem resolution CLICK HERE.

Tightened home sale exclusion and other revenue raisers in the 2008 Housing Act

Mike Habib, EA To pay for the $15.1 billion of housing tax incentives in the recently enacted “Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008” (the Housing Act), Congress passed several offsetting revenue raisers, including a requirement that banks provide information returns reporting annual credit card sales to IRS and to merchants, a provision requiring homeowners to pay tax on gains made from the sale of a second home to reflect the portion of time the home was used as a vacation or rental property, and a provision delaying for one year a “worldwide interest allocation provision” that would result in lower taxes for some multinational companies. Here are the details of these revenue-raising provisions.

Payment card and third party network information reporting For returns for calendar years beginning after 2010, the new law requires banks and online payment networks to file an information return with IRS reporting the gross amount of credit and debit card payments a merchant receives during the year, along with the merchant’s name, address, and taxpayer identification number (TIN). Reporting is also required for third party network transactions. Information reporting for third party network transactions will be required only for merchants that have (1) annual credit and debit card transactions exceeding $20,000 in the aggregate, and (2) an aggregate number of such transactions during the year that exceeds 200.

Credit for first-time homebuyers in the 2008 Housing Act

Mike Habib, EA The single largest provision in the $15.1 billion package of housing tax incentives in the recently enacted “Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008” (the Housing Act) is a measure allowing individuals buying their first home to take a tax credit of up to $7,500 of the purchase price. Designed to help reduce the existing stock of unoccupied housing, the tax credit allows qualified homebuyers to subtract the credit amount from their federal income tax when they buy a home. However, they are then required to pay the credit back over 15 years. The result is that the credit resembles an interest-free loan that must be repaid to the government. Here are the details of the new credit:

    • Individuals may credit the lesser of $7,500 or 10% of the price paid for the home against tax owed in the year of purchase. The $7,500 maximum credit applies both to individuals and married couples filing a joint return. A married individual filing separately can claim a maximum credit of $3,750.
    • The credit phases out for individual taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income between $75,000 and $95,000 ($150,000-$170,000 for joint filers) for the year of purchase.
    • In the second year after purchase, taxpayers who took the credit must start adding the credit amount back into taxes paid incrementally over 15 years with no interest charge. This would work as follows. Suppose a first-time homebuyer purchases a home this coming December. He could claim a tax credit equal to 10 percent of the purchase price of the home or $75,000, whichever is smaller, on his 2008 tax return. Assuming for purposes of this example that the amount of his credit is $7,500, he then would be required to pay $500 (one-fifteenth of the credit) back on his 2010 tax return and on his return for each of the following 14 years.
    • If the taxpayer sells the home (or the home ceases to be used as the principal residence of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s spouse) prior to complete repayment of the credit, any remaining credit repayment amount is due on the tax return for the year in which the home is sold (or ceases to be used as the principal residence). However, the credit repayment amount may not exceed the amount of gain from the sale of the residence to an unrelated person. For this purpose, gain is determined by reducing the basis of the residence by the amount of the credit to the extent not previously recaptured. No amount is recaptured after the death of a taxpayer. In the case of an involuntary conversion of the home, recapture is not accelerated if a new principal residence is acquired within a two-year period. In the case of a transfer of the residence to a spouse or to a former spouse incident to divorce, the transferee spouse (and not the transferor spouse) will be responsible for any future recapture.
    • The tax credit is refundable, meaning that households with incomes too low to owe income taxes could benefit from it.
    • The credit applies to homes purchased on or after April 9, 2008 and on or before July 1, 2009. A special rule allows those who purchase a principal residence after Dec. 31, 2008, and before July 1, 2009, to treat the purchase as made on Dec. 31, 2008 (effectively allowing them to claim the credit on their 2008 returns rather than on their 2009 returns).
    • A taxpayer is considered a first-time homebuyer if the individual (and the individual’s spouse if married) had no ownership interest in a principal residence in the U.S. during the 3-year period prior to the purchase of the home to which the credit applies.
    • No credit is allowed if the D.C. homebuyer credit is allowable for the taxable year the residence is purchased or a prior tax year, the taxpayer’s financing is from tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, the taxpayer is a nonresident alien, the taxpayer disposes of the residence (or it ceases to be a principal residence) before the close of the tax year for which the credit otherwise would be allowable, or the home is acquired from certain related persons or by gift or inheritance.

I hope this information is helpful. For tax problem resolution CLICK HERE.

Property tax deduction for non-itemizers in the 2008 Housing Act

Included in the $15.1 billion package of housing tax incentives in the recently enacted “Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008” (the Housing Act) is a measure creating a new, temporary property tax deduction for non-itemizers (i.e., for taxpayers who claim the standard deduction rather than itemizing their deductions). Here is a brief overview of this new provision:

  • The provision creates a new standard deduction for state and local real property taxes paid by non-itemizers. Since most homeowners who are paying on a mortgage have enough deductions (e.g., mortgage interest and property taxes) to justify itemizing them on their return, this new provision chiefly benefits homeowners who have paid off their homes.
  • The deduction is available only for one year–for tax years beginning in 2008.
  • The amount of deduction is as much as $500 for single filers and $1,000 for joint filers. Since this is a deduction and not a credit (i.e., a dollar-for-dollar reduction in tax liability), the actual tax benefit will not be substantial: $100 to a couple in the 10 percent tax bracket and $150 to a couple in the 15 percent bracket (and only $50 and $75, respectively, to singles in these brackets).

I hope this information is helpful.

For tax problem resolution CLICK HERE.

IRS explains how to claim (or elect out of) 50% Kansas bonus depreciation Notice 2008-67, 2008-32 IRB

Mike Habib, EA

The Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, popularly known as the Farm Act, provided temporary GO Zone-style tax relief for taxpayers in Kiowa County, Kansas, and surrounding areas, who were affected by the storms and tornadoes that began on May 4, 2007. This relief includes 50% bonus depreciation (Kansas additional first year depreciation) for qualified Recovery Assistance (RA) property placed in service by the taxpayer on or after May 5, 2007, during the tax year that includes May 5, 2007. IRS has issued detailed guidance explaining how to claim (or elect out of) this Kansas bonus depreciation.

No FUTA exemption for staffing company that was considered the employer for state UI purposes Chief Counsel Advice 200827007

Mike Habib, EA

The IRS has denied a federal unemployment tax (FUTA) exemption to a staffing company because it did not consider the company to be the common law employer of the workers in question

badge
badge
badge
badge
badge
badge
Contact Information